The following is my answer to a Quora question: “If a conjoined twin commits a crime, how do we determine which one
actually did it?”
Firstly, we have to know where they
are conjoined. This helps us understand
how to go about determining plausible guilt, and opportunity to commit the
crime. Also, some conjoined twins
involve one parasitic twin, meaning that there is only one legal person in this
case.
Secondly, conjoined twins are always
identical, monozygotic, where there is an incomplete separation during cell
division. What this means is that the
DNA will be almost identical, and that goes to blood type, and other body
fluids. However, fingerprints, toe
prints, tongue prints, and even dental records are distinct. They can be told apart legally, if there is
such physical evidence.
We must also remember that the use
of the hand causes distinct angles of impact, and it may be possible to narrow
down which hand was used, for example, in a stabbing incident, or in shooting a
gun. It is the same with the leg, and
footprints.
Finally, as part of the
investigative process, there is the police interview. The challenge here is that both twins cannot
be interviewed separately. Thus, it will
take skill to match their body language with the account, and pinpoint the
approach.
Coming back to the first point,
since both twins are always present at the commission of the offence, one or
the other is the perpetrator and accessory.
However, if it is a capital offence, unless both are guilty, we cannot
sentence the other to death since the law precludes the death sentence on the
twin who is not guilty of the capital charge.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.