The following is my answer to a Quora
question: “Does a
self-prepared last will and testament need to be in a specific font, and am I
required to deposit a copy in a court or government office?”
Singapore imposes no font
requirement whatsoever. Most people use
Times New Roman, or something readable and officious-looking, purely by
convention, not by law.
Section 4 of the Wills Act 1838 sets
the minimum age at 21. Section 6
requires the will to be in writing, signed by the testator at the foot or end
of the document, with that signature made or acknowledged before two or more
witnesses present at the same time, who then sign in the testator's
presence. Witnesses must be at least 21
years old and mentally capable. A
beneficiary, or a beneficiary’s spouse, cannot serve as a witness, and doing so
forfeits that person’s inheritance under Section 10, even if the rest of the
will remains valid.
Digital wills carry no legal
standing in Singapore. Wills are
excluded from the Electronic Transactions Act, meaning a digital signature does
not satisfy Section 6, regardless of how convenient an online will service
makes the process feel. A will prepared
through such a service must still be printed and physically signed in the
presence of two independent witnesses to hold any legal weight.
A Case Showing When
This Goes Wrong
The Singapore High Court case
reported at [2014] SGHC 129 shows the cost of getting this wrong. A will was executed before only one witness,
rather than the two Section 6(2) requires.
The court held the will invalid on that single defect. The estate was then distributed under intestacy
law instead, producing a distribution different from what the will had actually
instructed. Some named beneficiaries
received less than intended. Others, who
had been named in the invalid will, received nothing at all. One missing signature undid the testator’s
entire intention.
You are not required to deposit a
copy with the Singapore Academy of Law’s Wills Registry, but doing so is advisable. The Registry logged over 1,680 wills in 2024,
more than triple the figure from five years earlier, reflecting growing awareness
that a will nobody can locate is functionally useless. At minimum, keep a copy with your solicitor
or your chosen estate administrator.
Relying solely on the administrator carries risk: conflict of interest,
or outright impropriety, particularly where that administrator also stands to
benefit under the will. Registering the
will’s existence, and its location, with the Wills Registry remains the safer,
more defensible course.
Under Rule 34 of the Family Justice
(Probate and Other Matters) Rules 2024, anyone can lodge a caveat with the
Family Justice Courts after a death and before a grant of probate is
issued. While that caveat stands, the
Registrar cannot issue any grant, giving concerned parties a window to
investigate before the estate moves forward.
The caveat lasts six months, and a further caveat can be filed if the
investigation needs more time. Once a
grant of probate has already been extracted, contesting the will becomes
procedurally harder, which is why the first thirty days after death matter more
than most families realise.
Complication under
AMLA
Singapore’s Wills Act does not apply
uniformly to every testator. Section 111
of the Administration of Muslim Law Act specifically overrides a Muslim
testator’s freedom to distribute his estate exactly as he wishes. A will drafted by a Muslim domiciled in
Singapore cannot depart from the inheritance shares set out under the fara’idh
rules of the Muslim school of law he professes, regardless of what the will
document itself states. This
interpretation of fara’idh is limited to Singapore’s shari’ah court,
under the guidance of the fatawa, legal opinions, of the Islamic
Religious Council of Singapore. This
implies a Malay culture-specific interpretation of the Shafi’i school, regardless
of how some may claim otherwise.
This creates a trap for any Muslim
client using a generic will template built for a non-Muslim testator. A standard will, freely distributing assets
to a chosen mix of beneficiaries in whatever proportion the testator prefers,
may simply be unenforceable against the AMLA-mandated fara’idh shares
once the testator dies. A Muslim
testator wanting to allocate a portion of his estate outside the fixed fara’idh
shares, to a charity, a non-Muslim spouse, or an unequal distribution among
children, generally needs a separate instrument, such as a waswiyyat
capped at one-third of the estate, or a properly structured lifetime gift or
trust arrangement executed while he is still alive, rather than relying on the
will alone to achieve it. There are also
other instruments such as trusts and insurance nominations that bypass this.
Terence Nunis | Executive Chairman, Equinox Zenith | Author, The 1% Playbook: The Billionaire Cheat Code

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.