On the 02nd August 2019, I was at Yuhua Toastmasters
Club, as language evaluator, and ah counter.
I was also there to facilitate a forum.
This was my 23rd club visit, on the 33rd day of
the Toastmaster year.
Yuhua Toastmasters Club is an interesting club to
visit because it is the proving ground for several ideas that Muhammad Nurhakim
bin Mohamed Yusop, Mohamad Saddiqi, and myself have on how to make these
meetings interesting, engaging, and most importantly, something that people can
take away and apply immediately in the real world.
There were two prepared speeches. Muhammad Nurhakim bin Mohamed Yusop spoke
about eschewing laksa for more than two decades due to an incident in Primary
One. It was a study in how adverse
experiences hold us back from good things.
Sam Chou gave the second portion of his evaluation and
feedback project speech, about knowing ourselves to know others. This was especially interesting to me, since
I was the evaluator for the first part of the project, the day before.
For the table topics session, conducted by Mohamad Saddiqi bin Mohamad Said, there was a twist on the project, which required people to come up in
teams of two to attempt the topic in a sort of impromptu dialogue. This made it far more challenging, and fun.
We then had a sort of Toastmasters forum, so that we
could all discuss why people actually join a club on public speaking, their
actual motives and inspiration. It was a
good start to this initiative. Someone
said that he joined Toastmasters to outshine a nephew he despised, another
Toastmaster. One of them said that she
joined because she did not want to lose out at work. Someone else said that he joined to learn to
argue back. One person admitted that he
joined because it was a healthy outlet for his natural competitiveness, and he
was here to win competitions. That is
laudable.
The project evaluators were Lim Jia Hui, and Owen Ter.
Best
Table Topics Speakers: Sivanesan K. Murugayan & Myself, Joshua Sathasivam Shanmugam
& Ho Chiu Lin.
There
was a tie between two teams. There was
no voting for best speaker, and best evaluator because there were only two of
each.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.