I think very poorly of them. In theory, stablecoins are cryptocurrencies
that are pegged to a currency, most often the US Dollar, or the Swiss Franc, or
pegged to an exchange traded commodity, mostly gold. This peg is supposed to make stablecoins less
volatile, and more attractive to mainstream finance. Since it is pegged to a known currency or
commodity, it is supposed to facilitate a secondary market by making them
liquid by being more easily exchangeable.
Here is the main problem: how do we trust this peg,
when the backing reserves cannot be independently audited? Also, there is still some underlying
volatility inherent with currencies and commodities. This is more so for commodities. When the market undergoes upheaval, how will
they maintain the peg? To date, I am
very sceptical that any “stablecoin” has lived up to the criteria of actually
being stable.
Another point of consideration is regulatory concerns,
which means this peg is either impossible to maintain, or lacks credibility. For example, Basis, the most high profile and
well-funded stablecoin, shut down in December 2018. Their official reason was an unfavourable
regulatory landscape. We could argue
that the regulatory landscape is unfavourable because they cannot convince
anyone that they have the financial strength to maintain a viable peg over an
extended period of time. They raised
US$130 million in funding. That is not
enough to do what they want to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.