Singapore actually shares borders with only two
countries: Malaysia and Indonesia, making them our only immediate neighbours.
Malaysia has a love hate relationship with us. The
Malaysian political leadership loves to hate Singapore. Singapore, as a
multicultural, multiethnic, multireligious secular meritocracy is an affront to
the lie of Malay-based apartheid that is their bumiputera policy. In Malaysia, the Malays, and certain other
races such as the Ibans, Dayaks, Eurasians and Kadazan are considered native
races. A Chinese or Indian, despite
having been there for generations, is considered “pendatang”, an
immigrant, and discriminated against.
Singapore was forced to leave Malaysia because its
differences with this, because of socioeconomic considerations and because Lee
Kuan Yew and Tunku Abdul Rahman could not come to a compromise. After half a century, that sort of baggage is
still there. Malay nationalist
hardliners expected Singapore to fail without a hinterland and come crawling
back to Malaysia, and accede to their terms. That did not go according to plan.
To date, Malaysian politicians like to remind
Singapore that we are the little brother in this relationship, and should defer
to them on bilateral issues. Singapore,
as a sovereign state, being wealthier and having a larger military, has not
behaved as such. We conduct diplomacy
according to the letter of international law, and that means not giving in on
issues ranging from the water deal to the border dispute to Pedra Branca. It would be an understatement to say that
Malaysia’s leadership likely hates us. On
the other hand, they still need us. Corrupt
UMNO politicians own property in Singapore, and launder their gains through
Singapore’s financial system.
Indonesia has a complicated relationship with
Singapore, which is a subtler form of that Singapore-Malaysia dynamic. In Indonesia’s case, Singapore should defer to
Indonesia in regional politics. In the
1960s, Indonesia attempted to annex Singapore and Malaysia to form Nusantara. The Konfrontasi did not end well for
them.
A remnant of that relationship is the fact that
successive Indonesian regimes have expected Singapore to bankroll them. And when they did not get what they want,
threw a tantrum. An example would be Bacharuddin
Jusuf Habibie’s remark about Singapore being a “little red dot.”.
Despite this, Singapore did have an excellent
relationship with the Suharto regime, and most of their wealth was parked here.
This relationship became baggage when it
came to dealing with successor regimes after Suharto was overthrown. Singapore
also clandestinely supported Timor Leste’s independence, and has that sword
over other restive parts of Indonesia.
Despite the talk of a united ASEAN, these countries
have a relationship based more on need, mutual threats than true friendship. When it comes to the ordinary citizens, none
of this matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.