The following is my answer to a Quora question: “Where do the wealthy hold their money?”
The difference between the truly wealthy, and the
masses, is how they organise their assets. For one thing, wealthy people avoid holding
their assets, whether property, stocks, or even art, in their name. Assets belong to companies, trusts and
foundations. Assets held in such
entities are considered distinct from the owner of these entities. This mitigates tax liability, since a company
or trust is taxed after liabilities and deductions, whereas an individual is
taxed on gross income. This is
significant, because it is possible to expense out many things that we spend
on. Visit your friends overseas flying
first class? Business trip. Dinner in an expensive restaurant with your
buddies? Business entertainment costs. Bought a new car? Company asset.
Assets in foundations have tax deductions depending on
what the foundation does. For example,
in some parts of the world, including Singapore, there is a tax deduction for
donating art to certain institutions. If
that foundation is yours, then you have effectively donated to yourself, and
got a tax deduction out of it. For
example, you could buy fine art at a certain price, direct from the artist. You get it at US$1 million. You then have it appraised by an appraiser you
hired, and it is now US$5 million. You
then make a donation to a foundation you set up, that runs, or is a major donor
to a museum. Depending on the legalities
of the place, that donation is tax-deductible up to, perhaps, three times the
appraised value. You now have a tax
credit of US$15 million on US$1 million spent. Should you choose, somewhere down the road,
you could even arrange for the foundation to gift you that same piece of art
for your services to the community, and hold a gala dinner, raising funds for a
charity you started, among donors, for further tax credits.
Assets in companies and trusts are protected from
bankruptcy proceedings and asset seizure by creditors. Assets in trusts are confidential, unlike
companies, and you need not disclose them. Assets in companies may need to be disclosed,
but there are ways to hide things in plain sight. Assets in companies and trusts are also
protected from asset seizure and claims in disputes and in acrimonious divorce
proceedings. The problem with
pre-nuptial agreements is that they cannot cover everything, and the determined
person may find ways around it. You have
to prove each and every item is not a matrimonial asset, in some cases. But assets in your personal irrevocable trust
is considered to belong to a distinct entity - the trust. This is despite the fact that you can make
yourself the settlor, the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary. It is you giving to yourself.
Another asset class that wealthy like better than
normal people is insurance policies. For
example, wealthy people buy a lot of investment-linked plans. They can easily afford to put money in high
performance funds, and get separate, high net worth coverage plans, which are
superior to most retail plans. But when
it comes to an investment-linked plan, the coverage is declared, not the funds
inside the plan. For example, a person
can easily buy a plan with a regular premium of $2,400 annually. The coverage may be US$100,000 for death,
which is pocket change. But an
investment-linked plan allows you to top up whatever you wish, as long as you
can prove in the KYC that you are the legal source of the funds. A plan that has a face value of US$100,000
coverage could have millions inside.
In some parts of the world, some insurance companies
allow withdrawals from the investment-linked plans to be in the form of
cheques, and they can be sent anywhere that you specify as the correspondence
address, perhaps even a neighbouring country. That cheque is then cashed in that country,
and you have effectively moved money without going through the banking system,
and without scrutiny.
The wealthy, and the masses understand finance
differently, and are effectively playing a different game. Unlike the masses, wealthy people understand
the need and value of a good financial advisor who understands how the system
works, and they will pay for it. None of
the things above are illegal, which is very important. There is absolutely no need to break the law
when you can play with the letter of the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.