The following is my
answer to a Quora question: “Should we grant immunity to ISIS
fighters if they return to their home countries, as an incentive to collapse
ISIS from inside?”
No. Granting
them immunity does not guarantee that these people are deradicalised or that
they have renounced their violent exceptionalism. Instead, it gives their ideology a veneer of
respectability, and reduces this to a mere political struggle between contending
philosophies, instead of recognising them as an existential threat to
multiculturalism and secularism.
Also, we have to consider that supporters of ISIS
justify violence and attacks against non-combatants and civilians. We are putting foxes in the hen house. That is welcoming the terrorist threat, and
allowing them to recruit others.
The only good ISIS fighter is a dead ISIS fighter. I feel the same for their supporters, but we
need that facade of compassion, and that is why we have half measures such as
imprisonment and detention. Deradicalisation
is a process, but we must be cognisant of the fact that some people can never
renounce their beliefs. They cannot be
trusted in civilised society. They are a
cancer, and should be eliminated. That
is why we have the judicial death penalty for sedition and waging war against
the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.