The following is my
answer to a Quora question: “How harsh is the enforcement of those
strict laws in Singapore?”
The principle of law enforcement that Singapore uses
is preventive, as opposed to punitive. This
means that the penalties for offences are high to serve as a deterrent. The focus is not on judicial punishment after
the fact.
That being said, the enforcement of the law is
pragmatic, not harsh. Whilst the laws
are strict, the enforcement is not legalistic. If it were so, there would be a lot more
people in prison, and that would defeat the purpose of such strict laws. The reasoning behind this is because we treat
the people in Singapore as a resource, and human resource is too valuable to be
wasted. The purpose of the judicial system
is to reform, and not create career criminals.
There are categories of crimes where there is a death
penalty. Aside from drug trafficking,
they include culpable homicide amounting to murder, kidnapping for ransom, the
intentional discharge of a firearm and waging war against the state. Then, there are crimes with judicial caning as
a penalty, such as illegal immigration and overstaying, rioting, robbery,
extortion and various serious offences. In
the case of capital punishment, the deterrent effect keeps incidences of such
crimes statistically non-existent. To
get a conviction for a death penalty, the prosecution must prove the case
beyond reasonable doubt. An entire
process of due diligence applies to the gathering and processing of evidence to
protect the reputation of the judiciary.
The prison system is not simply a place of
incarceration, but a place where inmates are given a chance to further their
education and acquire technical skills. After
prison, there are halfway houses and job placement programmes. These are conscious efforts to reduce
recidivism. There is an entire
government department that looks after former inmates.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.