The following is my
answer to a Quora question: “What arguments exist for whole life
insurance over term life insurance?”
Both whole life and term have their uses. Generally, I recommend whole life when the
client is younger. If they can afford
it, I recommend a limited pay whole life, so they pay for the coverage during
their earning years only. When taken
early, whole life is cheap. It will
never be cheaper than a term plan, but when we calculate the total premium of a
whole life plan over the course of the payment term against multiple term plans
taken at successively later periods of life, whole life premiums are much
cheaper.
Secondly, whole life plans have a surrender value;
term plans do not. This makes them a
financial instrument that can be borrowed against if it absolutely becomes
necessary.
Finally, whole life coverage for the duration of the
plan, once incepted, is guaranteed. When
a term plan is up for renewal, and there is a claim against it, that renewed
term plan may not cover the condition claimed against, treating it as a
pre-existing condition. This may not be
true for all term plans, however.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.