The following is my
answer to a Quora question: “Why is commercial shipbuilding not
profitable or economically feasible in the US, even though the leading
shipbuilding countries in Europe, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore, are all
developed economies with high costs of labour?”
That is not strictly true. As a former navigating officer, I did some
vessel deliveries and maiden voyages, out of South Korea and Japan. Singapore, for example, does not engage in
wide-ranging commercial shipbuilding. The
market is geared towards drydocking, conversions and offshore platforms, which
is a niche market.
South Korea and China dominate shipbuilding, with more
than 75% of new builds coming from these two countries. China builds are cheaper, but they are not as
well finished as South Korean and Japanese builds. They are catching up, and getting better. They have the advantage of lower manpower
cost. South Korea and Japan use a lot of
automation, which cuts down on costs. Japanese builds are very expensive, but you
are buying a vessel that almost never breaks down. South Korean builds are not as reliable as
Japanese builds, but they are cheaper. South
Korea can lower cost due to economies of scale, and the sheer amount of builds.
Japan has literal production lines for
new builds that are kilometres long. Europe
has over 150 yards, but collectively have less than 10% of market share. They build for their own markets, many of them
smaller vessels for littoral waters, or the near abroad. They build a lot of ferries, luxury yachts,
and cruise ships. This is their niche.
The US does not have a niche for international
shipbuilding. They cannot build
container vessels as cheap as China and South Korea, as technically sound and
as quick as Japan. They do not have a
foothold on the niche markets of FPSOs, rigs, ferries and cruise ships. The US outsourced their production lines for
the maritime industry in the same way they outsourced them for much of the
manufacturing sector. It would take
massive investment to build up that sort of infrastructure to compete, and this
might mean importing thousands of workers from developing countries like
Singapore does, something that would be unpalatable in the current economic
climate. It might mean competing in
hiring trained workers until that domestic base is built up, which will raise
costs and cramp margins. It might mean
going head-to-head with established builders in niche markets, markets which
may already be protected and have captive clientele.
There is one area of shipbuilding that the US does
lead the world. It is the foremost
builder of warships, the largest aircraft carriers, other surface vessels and
submarines. The problem is that the
client is solely the US government is most categories.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.