If by viable, you mean to ask if there is a
market for it, then it is because enough people believe in it for it to exist. It is a growing field, and it is evolving. If by viable, you mean to ask if it will ever
be a credible alternative to normal banking and finance, I am extremely
sceptical. There are structural issues
for many of the products, and the investment products do not perform as well as
equivalent products in normal banking. In some areas, it is far too inferior to be
viable for a wider market.
One of the problems is the definition of riba’,
usury. Does it include any and all forms
of interest? If I send you money in
another country, and the financial institution charges more than the principal,
is that riba’, when we understand that there is an infrastructure cost
involved? Another issue is that Islamic
finance products, such as the swukuk are essentially the same thing as
normal financial products but with an Arabic name, and higher distribution
costs. There is the normal distribution
costs, and then there is the distribution cost of the “Islamic” accrediting
authority. We can also argue that there
is a credibility issue with the accreditation of so-called Islamic products
when the shari’ah compliance committees are not independent regulatory
authorities, but paid for by the banks themselves.
Before Islamic banking, there was a movement towards
ethical banking. Instead of reinventing
the wheel for cosmetic and vanity purposes, it would make more sense to revisit
ethical banking, and make it a standard throughout the industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.