Have you ever had a time, when you
wanted to tell someone off, but were constrained because he was your boss, or,
she was your customer, or she was your wife and you did not feel like sleeping
on the couch?
An insult is a disparaging
remark. It is verbal riposte, a play on
words, and an exaggeration of attributes.
To really hurt, there must be an element of truth. An insult need not be obscene, profane or
vulgar. Where is the challenge in mere
abuse? There is no class there.
Insults have been used throughout
history, in our literature, in our diplomacy, and even in our scripture. In Ancient Greece and Rome, insults were a
genre of plays. They were both social
and political commentary. Even the works
of William Shakespeare were replete with insults.
Closer to our time, from the
Romantics era, we have people like Samuel Langhorne Clemens, better known as “Mark
Twain”, and Oscar Fingal O’Flahertie Wills Wilde. For example, Samuel Clemens once said, “Last
week, I stated this woman was the ugliest woman I had ever seen. I have since been visited by her sister, and
now wish to withdraw that statement.”
Oscar Wilde once observed, “Some
cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go.”
In the Industrial Age, John Montagu,
4th Earl of Sandwich, from the House of Lords, verbally sparred with
John Wilkes, from the House of Commons.
So, there is a class element here.
Montagu allegedly said, “Sir, I do not know whether you will die on the
gallows or of the pox,”
Wilkes is reported to have replied, “That
depends, my lord, on whether I embrace your lordship’s politics or your
mistress.”
Closer to our time, we have the
apocryphal exchange between Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, and Viscountess
Nancy Witcher Langhorne Astor, who sat on opposite sides of Parliament. She once exclaimed, “Winston, if you were my
husband, I’d poison your tea.”
Churchill replied, “Nancy, if I
were your husband, I’d drink it.”
Lady Astor said, “Sir, you are
drunk.”
Churchill retorted, “That may be so,
Madam. But tomorrow, I will be sober,
and you will still be ugly.”
The art of the insult sharpens our
wit. It requires knowledge of the one
being addressed, their context and quick thinking. These are the traits of thinkers, of
ponderers and of contemplators. It moves
the masses, and a witty reply lives on, long after people may have even
forgotten our names.
How does this apply to us? A witty retort is better than the ache of
swallowing a thousand hurts. It allows
us to have our say before power, without facing the full consequences. After all, English is a language where
“ingenious” is very clever, and “ingenuous” is very stupid. And knowing the difference between the two,
lies the art of the insult.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.