The following
is my answer to a Quora question: “Has
the Federal Reserve lost its ability to stabilise the economy without relying
on constant deficit spending?”
You have
conflated two things. The question mixes
two different jobs. The Federal Reserve
sets monetary policy. Congress and the
Treasury run deficit spending. The real
question is whether the Federal Reserve’s tools still work when fiscal policy
has grown too large for monetary policy to offset. The evidence says no. The national debt sits near forty trillion
dollars. The Congressional Budget Office
reported net interest costs hit US$963 billion over ten months of fiscal
2026. That is US$3.18 billion a
day. The deficit reached US$1.8 trillion
over the same period. The full year
forecast now sits at US$2.1 trillion, US$200 billion above February’s estimate.
A rate cut used
to stimulate growth. Today, it also
lowers the government’s own borrowing cost on a debt this size, blurring the
line between monetary policy and fiscal rescue.
The Federal Reserve cannot raise rates freely to fight inflation without
also raising Washington’s own interest bill past what the budget can
absorb. That is not independence. That is a central bank negotiating with its
own government’s balance sheet before every decision.
Foreign
holdings of US Treasuries fell to US$9.299 trillion in June 2026, down from
US$9.371 trillion in May. Japan, the UK,
and China trimmed a combined US$61 billion.
China’s holdings dropped to US$633.4 billion, the lowest since September
2008. Net foreign inflows collapsed from
US$56.6 billion in May to US$6.8 billion in June. An eighty-eight per cent drop in one month. A thirty-year Treasury auction on 13th
August 2026 cleared at 5.216 per cent, the highest yield on that maturity since
2001. Demand came in weaker than
average. The stop-out yield priced above
what dealers expected. The market is
starting to ask a price the Federal Reserve cannot simply wave away with a
policy statement.
The
Yen Intervention Failed to Hide the Real Problem
The United
States and Japan carried out their first joint yen intervention since 1998,
after the yen fell to 163.73 per dollar, its weakest level in nearly four
decades. The New York Federal Reserve
sold euros, not dollars, to buy yen.
Japan tapped the Federal Reserve’s own repo facility instead of selling
Treasuries outright. Both governments
went out of their way to avoid touching the Treasury market directly. That both central banks avoided a normal sale
of their own reserve currency’s benchmark asset is an admission that the market
cannot absorb it cleanly. An
intervention meant to project strength ended up broadcasting the opposite.
Borrowing
Short Because Long Has Become Too Expensive
Treasury
Secretary Scott Kenneth Homer Bessent leaned on short-term bills for roughly
eighty-five per cent of debt issuance in recent years. Cheaper today. A rollover risk tomorrow, repeated every few
months on a debt this size. Janet Louise
Yellen did this first. Bessent
criticised her for it at the time, then did more of it once he held the job himself.
The Treasury
Borrowing Advisory Committee has already flagged a US$1.45 trillion funding
shortfall for fiscal 2027 to 2028 at current auction sizes. A government financing itself on short-term
paper is not managing risk. It is
postponing a bill it cannot yet afford to pay in full.
None of these
four signals sits in isolation. Rising
interest costs. Falling foreign
demand. A failed show of strength on the
yen. A funding structure built on the
cheapest, shortest-dated paper available.
Each one narrows the Federal Reserve’s room to manoeuvre further. Monetary policy alone was never meant to
carry a fiscal position this large. It
has been asked to anyway, and the strain is now visible in every auction result
the market hands back.
Terence
Nunis | Executive Chairman, Equinox Zenith | Author, The 1% Playbook: The
Billionaire Cheat Code

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.