The word “attention” is interesting,
since how it is used in a language gives us an understanding of how the people
who speak that language think.
The word, “attention” is derived
from “attend”, and comes into the English language from the Latin “ad”
and “tendere”, which collectively mean “to stretch”. Within the context of English, attention is
the act of paying heed, or noticing something.
In English, we “pay attention”. The implication is that the speaker is
valuable, and we have to honour the speaker by paying that attention. It is a one-sided affair, which points the
hierarchial development of that understanding.
Speaking in Spanish, however, you would
say, “presta atención”. “Presta”
means to lend, with the cultural implication that giving attention is transactional,
and the speaker is obliged to give that attention back. Therefore, attention that is not returned means
the communication of ideas is incomplete.
The French also say “presta
atención”, which is a sort of demand, even though it has the same meaning
as Spanish. However, in French, you could
also say, “faites attention”, which literally means “to do attention”,
since one is not in attention without attendance. It may be understood philosophically as not only
being physically present, which may be superfluous, but to be intellectually
and spiritually present. The French really want all of you to listen. The phrase has an element of caution, meaning
that the one spoken to is told to be careful.
The Germans have two phrases. They say, “Aufmerksamkeit schenken”,
when referring to people. It literally
means “to give attention”, since they are bestowing their time on the speaker. On the other hand, when referring to objects,
they might say “Aufmerksam auf etwas verwenden”, which literally means “use
attention for something”.
All these four languages are Western
European languages. Spanish and French
are Romance languages, derived heavily from Latin. German is a Germanic language. English evolved from Germanic dialects,
before adopting some French vocabulary after the Norman conquest. Even in related languages, phrases and the
use of verbs differ, which shapes the way native speakers unconsciously think. Thus, it is one thing to learn a language and
understand it technically. It is an
entirely different matter to be able to think like a native speaker, and understand
the connotations of the words spoken, at a deeper level.
Would love to hear about how this plays out in asian languages. As far as it goes in mandarin, I understand it as to 留意/注意leave your focus or to fix your focus, which seems hardly transactional in nature and does not being in the notion of others.
ReplyDeleteI have noticed that East Asian languages tend to be collective when it comes to ideas, whereas Anglo-Saxon tend to be individualistic. I am unsure as to whether the language shaped the thinking, or the thinking shaped the language. That would be worth exploring.
Delete