From 30th November
2023 to 12th December 2023, the United Nations Climate Change 28th
Conference of Parties convened in Dubai.
Red Sycamore attended. As then President
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Equinox GEMTZ, I chaired a panel on
“Carbon Credits: The Next Financial Instrument.” Ng Kin Foong, Chief Executive Officer of Red
Sycamore, chaired the panel on “ESG & Startups.” Both panels ran in the Green Zone, under
IEEE. Two further conferences have taken
place since. The record of what those
promises became is worth reading against what was said at the time.
We were past the point of
climate change then, and should have called it what it is: a climate
crisis. We were not meeting our climate
goals, and Red Sycamore’s position remained that investing in blue carbon
credits addresses biodiversity, food security, and water table salination
simultaneously. Blue carbon refers to
the carbon stored in coastal and marine ecosystems.
The
Kunming-Montreal Framework, and What Followed It
COP28’s conversations
built on the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted by almost
200 countries at the 15th Conference of Parties to the UN Convention
on Biological Diversity in December 2022, a plan to protect and restore nature
by 2050. The framework set targets for
reducing threats to biodiversity, ensuring ecosystem resilience, and
mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society, alongside the need
for finance, capacity-building, and technology transfer.
COP28 hosted the first
Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, a two-year process, beginning at
COP26, assessing where the world stood on climate action. The findings were blunt. The world needed a peak in global greenhouse
gas emissions by 2025, a 43% reduction by 2030, and a 60% reduction by 2035,
against 2019 levels, to hold warming to 1.5°C.
Parties agreed at COP28 to submit updated climate plans by COP30,
aligned with that same 1.5°C limit.
Parties also agreed to transition away from fossil fuels in the energy
sector, and to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030, an outcome later
branded the UAE Consensus.
COP29, Baku: The
Year the Language Changed
COP29 convened in Baku in
November 2024. It set a new climate
finance goal of US$300 billion annually by 2035, widely criticised as
inadequate against developing countries’ own request for US$1.3 trillion. Multilateral development banks separately
pledged US$120 billion annually by 2030 for low- and middle-income
countries. The Loss and Damage Fund
reached full operational status. Article
6’s rulebook, governing international carbon markets, was finalised, a genuine
structural milestone for the compliance carbon market Red Sycamore was built
around.
The damage sat
elsewhere. COP28’s own commitment to “transition
away from fossil fuels” simply vanished from COP29’s final text. No mention.
Sustainable Energy for All called it plainly: a reversal of the hard-won
progress made the year before.
COP30, Belém: Some
Ground Recovered, Some Deliberately Softened
COP30 convened in Belém,
Brazil, in November 2025. The final text
called for mobilising at least US$1.3 trillion annually by 2035 for climate
action, alongside operationalising and confirming replenishment cycles for the
Loss and Damage Fund. Adaptation finance
commitments were softened to “calling for efforts” to triple by 2035, five
years later than earlier drafts had proposed.
More than 80 countries backed Brazil’s proposal for an explicit fossil
fuel phase-out roadmap. It did not
survive the final hours of negotiation.
The adopted text refers only back to the UAE Consensus from COP28, two
years stale. Brazilian scientist Dr. Carlos
Afonso Nobre warned, before the final plenary, that fossil fuel use must reach
zero by 2040 to 2045 to avoid warming of up to 2.5°C, a trajectory he said
would mean the near-total loss of coral reefs and the collapse of the Amazon
rainforest.
One structural win
emerged from COP30. The Paris Agreement
Crediting Mechanism became fully funded and operational, a full year after
Article 6’s rulebook was finalised at COP29.
Carbon markets, the actual commercial mechanism blue carbon credits
depend on, are now credible, scalable infrastructure, not merely a negotiating
chapter.
The Money, Set
Against the Actual Cost
COP28 pledges to the Loss
and Damage Fund totalled just over US$600 million by the conference’s close,
against a cost the Swiss Re Institute projects could wipe out up to 18% of
global GDP by 2050 if temperatures rise 3.2°C.
Asian economies face the sharpest exposure, a 5.5% GDP hit in the best
case, 26.5% in a severe one. At the time
that the initial pledge was smaller than the cost of building the Dubai Expo
City venue hosting the conference itself, a damning comparison that still holds
after two further COPs of incremental progress.
Why Blue Carbon
Still Matters More Than Ever
Seagrasses, mangroves,
and salt marshes remain among the most effective blue carbon reservoirs
available, sequestering carbon dioxide in biomass and sediment, with
below-ground rhizomes and roots trapping organic carbon for extended periods. Seagrass meadows cover a small share of the
ocean floor yet account for a disproportionately large share of coastal carbon
sequestration, while also stabilising sediment against erosion and sustaining
biodiversity for the marine organisms living within them. These ecosystems remain under sustained
threat from coastal development, pollution, and climate change itself, and
their degradation releases the very carbon they had locked away.
Article 6 regulates
voluntary cooperation among countries pursuing their Nationally Determined
Contributions, incorporating both market mechanisms and non-market approaches
across finance, technology transfer, and capacity building. With PACM now operational following COP30,
the pathway toward fungible, compliance-grade blue carbon credits has moved
from theoretical to structurally real.
Red Sycamore’s own position, built on measurable, verifiable coastal
carbon projects, sits directly inside the infrastructure two additional years
of negotiation have finally activated.
There is still much work
to be done. COP28 promised a transition
away from fossil fuels. COP29 dropped
the phrase entirely. COP30 recovered
some of the finance ambition while failing, again, to secure an explicit
phase-out roadmap. To address this crisis,
to advocate for real sustainability, saving the oceans remains the key to
continued quality of life, and it remains the one commitment across three
consecutive conferences that nobody has yet found a way to quietly delete from
the final text.
Terence
Nunis | Executive Chairman, Equinox Zenith & Red Sycamore | Author, The
1% Playbook: The Billionaire Cheat Code

Good points, blue carbon credit is very important. COP28 is one of the critical milestones on whether we humans could survive on earth.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much. I do hope to see you at the session.
Delete