The following
is my answer to a Quora question: “Why do startup
founders often decline venture capital funding?”
Startup founders have declined
venture capital funding, but it does not happen as often as venture capital
rejecting startups. There are many
reasons I can think of, but the most common reason is that the terms of funding
are unacceptable to the board. Money
comes with strings attached. If those conditions
are not in the interest of the board, they will reject it. Sometimes, it is because of the unrealistic
expectations of the board. They want
money, but they do not want the accountability.
They do not want to lose control.
They quibble over loss of equity.
Another reason why founders decline funding is because they have other funders, or do not need those funds. Just as funders meet dozens of startups a session, startups present to many different funding groups. They will take the first one that comes along, or the one with the best deal. Taking one funder precludes taking another at the same stage of funding if the capitalisation table cannot accommodate them.
Another point of contention is conflict of interest. From a funder perspective, they are hedging their bets by investing in several startups in the same space. From a founder perspective, there is confidentiality concerns if the same funders are investing in your competitors, and the mentor is a party to a competitor. No discerning funder would take that sort of risk.
Finally, perhaps one of the more common reasons why startups decline
to take funding is simply because it fell apart, and founders cannot get
along. This is actually quite
common. Different working styles, different
expectations, different visions doom startups.
Money changes people, and when funding is on the table is often the
point of the first fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be poster.